Contract Law: From Trust to Promise to Contract (HLS2X) | Unit 1: Four Principles | Legal and Moral? | Mr. Big | Discussion Board

 

Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

August 26, 2020 

Contract Law: From Trust to Promise to Contract (HLS2X) 

Unit 1 |  Four Principles  | Legal and Moral? | Mr. Big | Discussion Board 

Instructor Charles Fried, Beneficial Professor of Law: 

My re-written lecture notes for Unit 1, Four Principles – Legal and Moral? – Mr. Big – Discussion Board hyperlink:  Mr. Big Discussion Board Answer

Hi Classmates: 

Here are my answers to the questions below. 

We now know that courts will refuse to enforce a contract, if its purpose is to bring about an illegal or immoral end. 

Why would the courts do this? 

The judiciary court system[s] will refuses to enforce or compel any real contract which are acts of illegality and immorality cooperation in trusts, promises, and commitments which leads to a parties offers exchanges with one (1) another and, our societal consciousness will prohibit and frown upon behaviors or acts such as, an extramarital affair relationships because “the sanctity of marriage is constitutionally recognized and likewise affirmed by our United States statutes, as a special contract of permanent union.” And, our judiciary court system[s] will not stand behind any infidelities acts, otherwise known as, adultery in a form of any coordinated bargaining activities that led to those parties extramarital affair offers exchanges are considered a misdemeanors or felonies depending on the criminal prosecution codes in each States’ law of adultery statutes. Therefore, in the eyes of our judiciary court system[s] does not want to get involved in any parties disputes who[m] had committed an illegal and immoral contract intent which are parties real cooperation in trusts, promises, and commitments with one (1) another through an informal legal relations and, not a real bargain exchanges. 

Should people be free to contract with each other for whatever they would like? 

No, not every party should be allowed to create any coordinated bargaining activities that led to their parties offers through cooperation in trusts, promises, and  commitments whatever a party would like because our societal laws and statutes will lose its scientific and law application conformability analogies or tests in an uniform codes that governs our society. If our society will allow parties to create an informal legal relations intents where rules will no longer applies to any given parties cases than our society will lose its scientific and law application conformability analogies or tests in an uniform codes govern and applied by our judiciary court system[s]. This means our judiciary court system[s] will eventually “goes to hell in a handbasket,” and, our civil liberty or rights are gone with the wind.