Contract Law: From Trust to Promise to Contract (HLS2X) | Unit 1: Four Principles | Invitation to Dinner | Discussion Board
Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash
August 6, 2020
Contract Law: From
Trust to Promise to Contract (HLS2X)
Unit 1 | Four Principles | Discussion of Other Cases
Instructor Charles Fried, Beneficial
Professor of Law:
My re-written lecture notes for Unit
1, Four Principles – Discussion of Other Cases hyperlink: https://1drv.ms/b/s!Ar6iJPTO61dwxDe5I7xSh7eK0DWm
Discussion Board:
In March of 2020, I had scheduled and coordinated an appointment bargaining activity for the following week on a Wednesday afternoon with the Rental Property Manager for a potential leasing opportunity; in order to tour an apartment listed onto apartment.com online web application. In which, I was a potential residential tenancy to the Rental Property Manager’s agency. Somehow, I had forgot about my scheduled and coordinated appointment bargaining activity with the Rental Property Manager due from an unforeseeable circumstance. And, my fallibility in an unwarranted distractions focusing on my relevant missteps from our societal events arises from novel coronavirus disease outbreak causing our United States to mandate a stay-at-home and shelter-in-place orders which had caused me to miss my schedule appointment with the Rental Property Manager from her expectation for me to show up to our coordinated appointment bargaining activity, as I had agreed and scheduled on a Wednesday afternoon. Yes, I did make a scheduled and coordinated appointment bargaining activity that created a business-to-customer (B2C) relationship from a linguistic and linguistic features application for applying communicative appointment scheduling for a Wednesday afternoon through email correspondences with the Rental Property Manager.
My scheduled and coordinated appointment bargaining activity absenteeism does create intents for a legal relation; and yes, my schedule appointment absenteeism does qualify for a government intervention or create any legal cause of actions in any United States small claims judiciary court system because the Rental Property Manager was affected by most from her inconvenient of time lost and travel expend to and from the rental apartment location and, her unreasonable high expectation for me to show up at our scheduled and coordinated appointment bargaining activity together. And, the Rental Property Manager may have been annoyed, agitated, and disappointed, but she did not endure any pain or suffering from my scheduled and coordinated appointment bargaining activity absenteeism. So, the question remain, is the Rental Property Manager lost in her inconvenient of time and travel expend worth filing a lawsuit against me for an amount approximately of twenty dollars ($ 20)? In order for the Rental Property Manager to sue me, she must first (1st) have to pay a filing fee at the small claims judiciary civil court which is about one-hundred dollars ($100) then she have to pay someone to serve me papers this is around about thirty-five additional dollars ($ 35). And, in the end, the Rental Property Manager must evaluate her small claim court costs and, ask herself is it worth suing me in the amount of approximately twenty dollars ($ 20) for not showing up at our scheduled and coordinated appointment?
On the other hand, the United States had mandated a nation lockdown on March 2, 2020, after, the novel coronavirus disease outbreak engulf our country that created an extraordinary public health events and, I was forced to miss my scheduled and coordinated appointment bargaining activity with the Rental Property Manager which does not created a legal relation because the United States had mandated an emergency alerts for our safety in public health extraordinary events occurrences which nulls and voids, meaning no legal effects in all public and private scheduled and coordinated appointment bargaining activities during the novel coronavirus disease outbreak within the United States economy.
Classmate what do you think?
Comments