Sarai Hannah Ajai's Incident Report Regarding Ring Patio Camera Video Gap, Reported Tenant Harassment, Verizon Account Credential Changes, Apple Device Passcode Changes, Possible iCloud Ecosystem Account Compromise, and SwitchBot Lock-Log Correlation

Public Redacted Incident Report Regarding Ring Patio Camera Video Gap, Reported Tenant Harassment, Verizon Account Credential Changes, Apple Device Passcode Changes, Possible iCloud Ecosystem Account Compromise, and SwitchBot Lock-Log Correlation  

Formal Incident Report Narrative

Reporting Party: Sarai Hannah Ajai
Apartment Unit: 2**
Incident Date: June 11, 2026
Primary Timeframe: Approximately 9:01 AM through 11:05 AM CDT, with Ring footage visible at approximately 10:52 AM and 10:54 AM CDT
Primary Residence Location: Apartment Unit 2**, full residential address redacted
Related Building Locations: Building , Apartment Unit 2*; separate building, alleged tenant location; upper-unit tenant activity reported near Apartment Unit 3**
Primary Devices / Systems Involved: Apple iPhone 17, Apple Smartwatch 7, Mac Mini M1, iPad M3 Air, Verizon account, Verizon eSIM, Verizon voicemail, Ring Patio Camera, Ring application, SwitchBot Kitchen Door Entrance lock log, Apple ID / iCloud ecosystem account, and related account-access records
Prepared For: Public incident documentation, personal legal records, housing/security documentation, cybersecurity documentation, evidence preservation, property-management review, telecommunications-provider review, platform-provider review, and possible future submission to appropriate agencies, service providers, or law enforcement
Date Prepared: June 11, 2026

I. Summary of Incident

On or about June 11, 2026, I, Sarai Hannah Ajai, reviewed Ring Patio Camera footage through the Ring application on my Apple iPhone at approximately 11:05 AM CDT. During this review, I observed that the Ring application displayed available Ring Patio Camera video clips from the relevant morning period. I identified the available clips for documentation purposes as Exhibit A1 and Exhibit A2.

I also observed what I believe to be a material video gap or missing Ring video interval between the available footage. I am documenting this because I believe the missing or unavailable interval may correspond to a period when an individual known to me only as L*y** allegedly made derogatory, threatening, or privacy-invasive statements concerning my biological female birth sex, identity, device security changes, Verizon account changes, Apple device passcode changes, and intended mailing of letters through the United States Postal Service.

I did not communicate with Ly** during this period. I was inside Apartment Unit 2**. I do not have a personal relationship with Ly** and do not have ongoing communications with him. I only became aware of his first name after I previously overheard him identify himself to a former tenant who lived below me in Apartment Unit 1** while he was assisting with moving furniture through the patio area in or around June 2023.

The concern is significant because I had changed several Verizon, Apple, and device passcodes or credentials earlier that morning. I report that Ly** allegedly shouted loudly near his vehicle in a manner that appeared to reference these private security changes, including that I had changed device passwords and that I was preparing to mail letters. Because I had not told Ly** this information, I believe the statements raise serious concerns regarding possible unauthorized device monitoring, account access, device mirroring, device cloning, compromised credentials, unauthorized knowledge of Verizon account changes, unauthorized knowledge of Apple device changes, or other unauthorized digital observation.

At this time, I am not stating that the Ring video alone proves L*y’s** identity, proves the precise statements made, or proves unauthorized electronic access. I am documenting the visible evidence, my personal observations, the missing-video concern, the timing of account and device changes, the possible compromise of my Verizon account and Apple/iCloud ecosystem, and the need to preserve and review related account-access records.

II. Relevant Background

I reside in Building , Apartment Unit 2*. The individual known to me only as Ly** is believed by me to live in a separate building within the same apartment community. I do not personally know Ly**, have not had a personal relationship with him, and have not maintained ongoing communications with him.

On June 11, 2026, I made several credential and device-security changes while inside my apartment unit, 2**. I later reviewed Ring Patio Camera footage and observed activity in the parking area involving a black pickup-style vehicle near a royal blue vehicle. I also observed a second adult person carrying a light blue/green laundry basket or container near a royal blue vehicle.

I also preserved a SwitchBot Kitchen Door Entrance lock-log screenshot, identified as Exhibit B1, because I believe it is relevant to documenting apartment-door activity. The visible portion of Exhibit B1 shows lock and unlock events from June 9, 2026 and June 7, 2026. The captured portion does not show later activity in the visible screenshot; however, the full SwitchBot lock-history export should be obtained before making a final conclusion about all lock activity after June 9.

III. Detailed Timeline of Reported Account and Device Security Changes

On June 11, 2026, I report making the following Verizon, Apple, iCloud, and device-security changes while inside Apartment Unit 2**:

1. 9:01 AM — Verizon account password changed.
2. 9:02 AM — Verizon four-digit PIN changed.
3. 9:02 AM — Verizon voicemail changed.
4. 9:04 AM — Apple iPhone 17 passcode changed.
5. 9:05 AM — Apple iPhone 17 Screen Time passcode changed.
6. 9:05 AM — iPhone 17 Verizon eSIM-related PIN changed.
7. 9:06 AM — Apple Smartwatch 7 PIN changed.
8. 9:16 AM — Mac Mini M1 iCloud ecosystem account password changed.
9. 9:24 AM — Mac Mini M1 login password changed.
10. 9:39 AM — iPad M3 Air passcode changed.

These security changes are relevant because I later heard or perceived statements allegedly made by L*y** that appeared to reference private device and account-security activity that I had not communicated to him.

IV. Ring Patio Camera Review and Missing-Video Concern

At approximately 11:05 AM CDT on June 11, 2026, I opened the Ring application on my Apple iPhone 17 and reviewed available Ring Patio Camera footage.

The Ring application showed video clips from approximately:

• 10:52:13 AM to 10:52:27 AM CDT, preserved as Exhibit A1.
• 10:54:45 AM to 10:54:59 AM CDT, preserved as Exhibit A2.

I report that a material intervening video interval appeared to be missing, unavailable, or not shown in the Ring application. I believe this missing interval is important because it may correspond to the time period when L*y** allegedly made derogatory and threatening statements concerning my biological female birth sex and identity, my Verizon and Apple device security changes, and my intention to mail letters through USPS.

I am not stating that the missing Ring clip alone proves unauthorized deletion or account tampering. However, based on the timing, the alleged statements, and the apparent absence of a material video interval, I request that Ring account logs, Ring video history, Ring device-health records, cloud video retention records, shared-user access, and any deletion or access logs be preserved and reviewed.

V. Exhibit A1 — Ring Patio Camera Video

File Type: MP4 video
Approximate Duration: 14 seconds
Visible Timestamp: June 11, 2026, approximately 10:52:13 AM to 10:52:27 AM CDT
SHA-256 Hash:
8e0d091ec5c206bc55123112743a27d01d45482*************************

Visible Details

Exhibit A1 shows a parking-lot area captured by Ring Patio Camera footage. A black pickup-style vehicle is visible near a royal blue vehicle. One adult person is visible near the black vehicle.

I recognize the person shown near the black vehicle as L*y**. However, due to distance, camera angle, video quality, and the limits of the footage, the video should be treated carefully. The footage documents visible activity near the vehicle area, but it does not independently prove the person’s identity, does not independently prove the contents of any spoken statements, and does not independently prove unauthorized electronic access.

I further report that the video does not clearly show the person’s mouth moving in a way that independently verifies specific statements. Any alleged statements should be treated as statements I report hearing or perceiving from the area, not as statements conclusively established by the visible footage alone.

VI. Exhibit A2 — Ring Patio Camera Video

File Type: MP4 video
Approximate Duration: 15 seconds
Visible Timestamp: June 11, 2026, approximately 10:54:45 AM to 10:54:59 AM CDT
SHA-256 Hash:
0c8b1006db46254eadf5de551a5379985817549*************************

Visible Details

Exhibit A2 shows the black pickup-style vehicle leaving the parking-lot area. The same clip also shows a second adult person carrying a light blue/green laundry basket or container. The second person walks toward or near a royal blue vehicle and appears to handle the basket or container near the vehicle.

I believe this second adult person may be a tenant who lives above me in Apartment Unit 3**. I do not personally know this person and do not have ongoing communications with him. I found the activity concerning because the apartment building has laundry facilities on each floor, and the person appeared to move toward the vehicle in a rushed manner with the basket or container shortly after I had changed Verizon, Apple, and device credentials.

However, the video does not independently establish what was inside the basket or container. The video does not independently prove that any unauthorized electronic device was present, does not prove device mirroring or cloning, and does not prove that the person caused any unauthorized access to my Verizon or Apple devices. I am documenting the conduct because I found it unusual under the circumstances and because it occurred during the same general timeframe as the reported missing Ring video interval and alleged statements by L*y**.

VII. Exhibit B1 — SwitchBot Kitchen Door Entrance Lock Log Screenshot

File Type: JPG screenshot
System Shown: SwitchBot Kitchen Door Entrance lock log
Visible Log Dates: June 9, 2026 and June 7, 2026
SHA-256 Hash:
bb428b31c5428041b8faa2cfd5ac3582e45be77*************************

Visible Details

Exhibit B1 shows the Kitchen Door Entrance lock log. The visible portion of the screenshot includes lock and unlock entries from June 9, 2026, including entries attributed to Remote, Keypad, and Alexa. The visible entries include:

• June 9, 2026, 3:18 PM — Kitchen Door Entrance unlocked — Remote
• June 9, 2026, 3:22 PM — Kitchen Door Entrance locked — Keypad
• June 9, 2026, 6:12 PM — Kitchen Door Entrance unlocked — Remote
• June 9, 2026, 6:20 PM — Kitchen Door Entrance locked — Alexa
• June 9, 2026, 6:42 PM — Kitchen Door Entrance unlocked — Remote
• June 9, 2026, 6:44 PM — Kitchen Door Entrance locked — Keypad
• June 9, 2026, 9:03 PM — Kitchen Door Entrance unlocked — Remote
• June 9, 2026, 9:07 PM — Kitchen Door Entrance locked — Alexa
• A visible older entry from June 7, 2026, showing Kitchen Door Entrance locked — Alexa

This screenshot is relevant because it helps document visible lock activity and apartment-door history. The visible captured portion may support that no later lock activity appears in that portion of the screenshot. However, for accuracy, the complete SwitchBot lock-history export should be preserved and reviewed before making a final conclusion that no additional lock or unlock events occurred after June 9, 2026.

I state that this lock-log evidence is relevant to my position that I had not knowingly left Apartment Unit 2** on June 11, 2026 during the relevant period. That position should be verified through the complete SwitchBot lock history, Ring camera footage, Apple location records if available, and any other reliable contemporaneous records.

VIII. Reported Statements and Safety Concern

I report that L*y** allegedly shouted loudly near his vehicle in a manner audible to the apartment complex. I further report that his statements appeared to include references to my changed passwords, my device security changes, and my intent to mail letters to a USPS location.

The alleged statements were concerning because I had made several private account and device changes while inside Apartment Unit 2** and had not communicated that information to L*y**. If the statements were accurately heard and accurately attributed, they may indicate that private information about my Verizon account, Apple devices, iCloud ecosystem, or personal actions was being obtained without my authorization.

I also report that the alleged statements included derogatory or threatening references concerning my biological female birth sex and identity. I am documenting those statements as part of a broader safety, harassment, privacy, and identity-protection concern.

At this time, I do not have independent forensic confirmation identifying the method by which any person could have known my account or device changes. I am therefore requesting preservation and review of digital logs rather than making a final technical conclusion.

IX. Federal Statutory Review Addendum — Potential Federal Statutes Implicated by the Reported Verizon, Apple Device, and iCloud Ecosystem Compromise

This section is included for documentation and agency-review purposes. I am not making a final legal determination that each statute was violated. I am identifying federal statutes that may be implicated if records confirm unauthorized access to my Verizon account, Apple devices, iCloud ecosystem account, Ring account, SwitchBot account, stored communications, device passcodes, electronic communications, authentication credentials, or related account data.

1. 18 U.S.C. § 1030 — Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Description: This federal statute addresses unauthorized access to protected computers, exceeding authorized access, obtaining information from a protected computer, access with intent to defraud, damage to protected computers, computer-related loss, password trafficking, and related attempts or conspiracies.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if any person intentionally accessed, attempted to access, or exceeded authorized access to my Apple iPhone 17, Mac Mini M1, iPad M3 Air, iCloud ecosystem account, Ring account, SwitchBot account, Verizon online account, or related digital systems without authorization. It may also be implicated if any person obtained private information, interfered with access, caused unauthorized changes, caused device instability, used passwords or passcodes without authorization, or used account access to obtain information of value.

Evidence requiring review: Apple ID login records, iCloud device list, Verizon account login history, eSIM activity, Ring login history, SwitchBot login history, IP addresses, device fingerprints, session records, password-change records, passcode-change records, and any records showing access by an unknown device or unknown location.

2. 18 U.S.C. § 2701 — Stored Communications Act, Unlawful Access to Stored Communications

Description: This federal statute addresses unauthorized access to a facility through which electronic communication service is provided, or exceeding authorized access, where the conduct results in obtaining, altering, or preventing authorized access to wire or electronic communications while in electronic storage.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if any person accessed my iCloud-stored data, Verizon voicemail, stored text messages, stored account notifications, Ring video history, Ring cloud footage, SwitchBot account records, email records, or other stored electronic communications without authorization. It may also be implicated if any person altered, concealed, deleted, made unavailable, or prevented my access to stored electronic communications or cloud records.

Evidence requiring review: iCloud data-access records, Verizon voicemail access logs, Ring cloud video history, deleted-video records, Ring shared-user logs, Apple account security logs, account notification history, MFA records, cloud-session activity, and provider preservation records.

3. 18 U.S.C. § 2511 — Interception and Disclosure of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications

Description: This federal statute addresses intentional interception, attempted interception, disclosure, or use of wire, oral, or electronic communications without lawful authorization, subject to statutory exceptions.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if any person intercepted, monitored, captured, used, or disclosed my electronic communications, device-screen activity, account-change notifications, calls, voicemail, text messages, iCloud communications, Ring communications, or related electronic transmissions without authorization. It may also be relevant if live device activity was being viewed or monitored in real time, including any unauthorized method of obtaining information about credential changes while those changes were being made.

Evidence requiring review: Verizon call and voicemail records, Apple device activity records, iCloud access records, notification records, unknown device-pairing records, screen-sharing records, remote-access artifacts, network logs, router logs, and any evidence of unauthorized surveillance software or device mirroring.

4. 18 U.S.C. § 1029 — Access Device Fraud

Description: This federal statute addresses fraud and related activity involving access devices, including counterfeit, unauthorized, altered, stolen, expired, revoked, or fraudulently obtained access devices. Access-device issues may include account numbers, PINs, telecommunications identifiers, and related authentication data depending on the facts.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if any person used, possessed, obtained, trafficked in, or attempted to use my Verizon account credentials, Verizon PIN, eSIM-related information, account identifiers, authentication credentials, Apple account credentials, or other access-device information without authorization and with fraudulent intent.

Evidence requiring review: Verizon account PIN-change records, Verizon password-change records, eSIM records, SIM/eSIM provisioning records, authentication logs, device-swap records, customer-service interaction records, account-recovery logs, and any record of unauthorized account access or attempted account access.

5. 18 U.S.C. § 1028 — Fraud and Related Activity in Connection With Identification Documents, Authentication Features, and Information

Description: This statute addresses fraudulent or unauthorized use, transfer, possession, or production of identification documents, authentication features, and means of identification.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if any person used my name, phone number, account identifiers, device identifiers, Verizon account information, Apple ID, iCloud identifiers, eSIM identifiers, or other means of identification without lawful authority in connection with account access, device access, impersonation, account recovery, digital surveillance, or related unlawful activity.

Evidence requiring review: Verizon identity-verification records, account-recovery records, Apple ID account-recovery records, customer-service logs, device identifiers, trusted-device additions, identity-verification questions, fraud alerts, and any indication that a person attempted to impersonate me to gain account access.

6. 18 U.S.C. § 1028A — Aggravated Identity Theft

Description: This statute applies when a person knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person during and in relation to certain felony offenses.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if any person used my identifying information, account identifiers, phone number, Apple ID, Verizon credentials, device identifiers, or related identifying data during and in relation to another federal felony, such as unauthorized computer access, wire fraud, access-device fraud, or another qualifying offense.

Evidence requiring review: Account-access records, evidence of impersonation, Verizon customer-service records, Apple account-recovery records, unauthorized trusted-device records, account-change confirmations, and any evidence that my identity information was used in connection with another federal offense.

7. 18 U.S.C. § 1343 — Wire Fraud

Description: This federal statute addresses schemes to defraud or obtain money or property by false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises through interstate wire, radio, television, or electronic communications.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if any person used electronic communications, telephone systems, internet systems, Verizon systems, Apple systems, Ring systems, or related interstate communication systems as part of a scheme to obtain money, property, account access, device access, personal data, authentication credentials, or other property-like interests through deception.

Evidence requiring review: Any financial loss records, unauthorized purchases, account charges, Verizon billing changes, Apple account changes, eSIM changes, device-access attempts, fraudulent support contacts, account-takeover attempts, and any electronic communications used in furtherance of fraud.

8. 18 U.S.C. § 2261A — Federal Stalking / Cyberstalking

Description: This statute addresses certain interstate stalking and cyberstalking conduct, including use of electronic communication services, interactive computer services, electronic communication systems, or interstate-commerce facilities with intent to harass, intimidate, place under surveillance, or cause substantial emotional distress or fear, depending on the facts.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if a person used electronic systems, mobile accounts, internet-connected services, device monitoring, digital surveillance, or repeated electronic conduct to harass, intimidate, place me under surveillance, or cause substantial emotional distress. This statute should be reviewed separately from any non-electronic parking-lot statements because the federal cyberstalking theory depends on proof of qualifying use of electronic systems or interstate-commerce facilities.

Evidence requiring review: Repeated account-access events, electronic messages, device-monitoring artifacts, Ring or Apple access logs, Verizon logs, unknown trusted-device additions, repeated login attempts, location-based monitoring evidence, and records showing a course of conduct rather than a single isolated event.

9. 18 U.S.C. § 1519 — Destruction, Alteration, or Falsification of Records in Federal Investigations or Matters

Description: This statute addresses knowingly altering, destroying, concealing, falsifying, or making false entries in records, documents, or tangible objects with intent to impede, obstruct, or influence a matter within federal jurisdiction or in relation to such a matter.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated if any person knowingly deleted, concealed, altered, falsified, or made unavailable Ring video footage, account logs, Verizon records, Apple records, iCloud records, SwitchBot records, or other digital evidence with the intent to interfere with a federal complaint, agency review, cybercrime report, law-enforcement matter, or contemplated federal matter.

Evidence requiring review: Ring video retention records, deleted-video logs, account-access logs, provider audit logs, evidence-preservation records, timestamps showing missing video intervals, and any record of manual or account-based changes to footage or logs.

10. 47 U.S.C. § 222 — Telecommunications Customer Information and CPNI Privacy Duties

Description: This federal telecommunications statute imposes duties on telecommunications carriers to protect the confidentiality of proprietary information and customer proprietary network information, subject to statutory exceptions.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This provision may be relevant to Verizon’s obligations to protect customer account information, customer proprietary network information, account-access records, phone-service information, authentication records, and related telecommunications data. This section may support a request that Verizon preserve account-access logs, review possible unauthorized account access, review SIM/eSIM records, and provide fraud-protection support.

Evidence requiring review: Verizon CPNI access records, account-authentication history, customer-service notes, PIN-change history, password-change history, eSIM provisioning history, voicemail access records, and records of any unauthorized disclosure or access to customer information.

11. 18 U.S.C. § 371 — Conspiracy to Commit an Offense Against the United States

Description: This statute addresses agreements by two or more persons to commit a federal offense, where at least one person performs an act to further the object of the agreement.

Possible relevance to this incident:
This statute may be implicated only if evidence shows that two or more persons agreed to commit a federal offense related to unauthorized account access, device access, identity misuse, wire fraud, cyberstalking, evidence alteration, or another federal offense, and that at least one act was performed to further that agreement.

Evidence requiring review: Communications between involved persons, coordinated activity, overlapping access logs, repeated timing patterns, surveillance evidence, property camera footage, account records, and any records showing coordinated conduct rather than unrelated individual actions.

X. Federal Statutory Review Summary

Based on the reported compromise concerns, the federal issues requiring review include:

1. Unauthorized access to protected computers or accounts involving Apple devices, iCloud, Ring, SwitchBot, Verizon, or related services.
2. Unauthorized access to stored communications involving iCloud, voicemail, Ring cloud video, app notifications, account records, or similar stored electronic data.
3. Possible interception or use of electronic communications if live account activity, device activity, calls, notifications, or messages were monitored without authorization.
4. Possible access-device misuse involving Verizon account credentials, PINs, eSIM credentials, telecommunications identifiers, or authentication data.
5. Possible identity misuse involving my name, phone number, account credentials, Apple ID, Verizon account identifiers, device identifiers, or other means of identification.
6. Possible wire fraud if electronic systems were used as part of a fraudulent scheme to obtain account access, device access, property, money, services, or sensitive data.
7. Possible cyberstalking or electronic harassment if electronic systems were used to monitor, harass, intimidate, or place me under surveillance.
8. Possible alteration or concealment of digital evidence if Ring video, account logs, cloud records, or provider records were knowingly altered, concealed, or made unavailable in relation to a federal complaint or investigation.
9. Telecommunications privacy and CPNI concerns involving Verizon’s customer-data protection obligations and account-security review.
10. Possible coordinated conduct if evidence shows that two or more persons knowingly participated in a plan to commit a federal offense.

XI. Suspected Unauthorized Conduct

Based on my observations, the Ring footage, the apparent missing Ring interval, the timing of credential changes, the alleged statements, and the SwitchBot lock-log screenshot, I believe this incident may involve one or more of the following concerns:

1. Possible Ring Video Gap or Missing Video Interval

A material Ring Patio Camera video interval appeared missing or unavailable during a period I believe may be relevant to alleged threatening or privacy-invasive statements.

2. Possible Unauthorized Ring Account Access or Video Activity

Ring account-access logs, shared-user settings, video deletion records, device-health history, and cloud-retention logs should be reviewed to determine whether any unauthorized access, deletion, account change, or other digital tampering occurred.

3. Possible Unauthorized Verizon Account Access

Because alleged statements appeared to reference private Verizon account and device-security changes, I am concerned that my Verizon account may have been accessed, monitored, or used without authorization. This concern includes the Verizon account password, four-digit PIN, voicemail, eSIM-related settings, customer-service verification, and account-change records.

4. Possible Unauthorized Apple Device or iCloud Ecosystem Access

Because alleged statements appeared to reference private Apple device-security changes, I am concerned that my Apple iPhone 17, Apple Smartwatch 7, Mac Mini M1, iPad M3 Air, Apple ID, or iCloud ecosystem account may have been accessed, monitored, mirrored, cloned, or observed without authorization.

5. Possible Unauthorized Device Monitoring, Mirroring, or Cloning

I am concerned that private device activity may have been observed without my consent. This concern is based on the timing of the credential changes, the alleged statements, and the fact that I had not communicated these changes to L*y**.

6. Possible Tenant Harassment or Intimidation

I report that L*y** allegedly made loud derogatory or threatening statements concerning my identity and private activities. I am documenting this as a reported harassment and safety concern.

7. Possible Coordination or Suspicious Tenant Activity

Exhibit A2 shows another adult person carrying a light blue/green basket or container near a blue vehicle. I found the conduct unusual because of the timing, the available laundry facilities inside the building, and the person’s movement toward a vehicle. However, I do not claim that the video alone proves what was inside the basket or container or proves electronic-device misconduct.

8. Apartment Security and Lock-Log Correlation

Exhibit B1 is relevant because it provides visible SwitchBot lock history. The full lock-history export should be reviewed to confirm whether any lock or unlock activity occurred on June 11, 2026 during the relevant timeframe.

XII. Evidence Preservation

I preserved the following evidence:

1. Exhibit A1: Ring Patio Camera MP4 video, approximately 14 seconds, timestamped June 11, 2026, approximately 10:52:13 AM to 10:52:27 AM CDT.
2. Exhibit A2: Ring Patio Camera MP4 video, approximately 15 seconds, timestamped June 11, 2026, approximately 10:54:45 AM to 10:54:59 AM CDT.
3. Exhibit B1: SwitchBot Kitchen Door Entrance lock-log JPG screenshot showing visible entries from June 9 and June 7.
4. Personal notes regarding the reported missing Ring video interval.
5. Personal timeline of Verizon, Apple, iCloud, and device passcode changes made on June 11, 2026.
6. Personal observations regarding alleged statements by L*y**.
7. Personal observations regarding the second adult person carrying a light blue/green laundry basket or container near a vehicle.
8. Any related Verizon, Apple, iCloud, Ring, SwitchBot, router, or device-security records that may later be obtained.

Verified SHA-256 Evidence Hashes

Exhibit A1 MP4:
8e0d091ec5c206bc55123112743a27d01d45482*************************

Exhibit A2 MP4:
0c8b1006db46254eadf5de551a5379985817549*************************

Exhibit B1 JPG:
bb428b31c5428041b8faa2cfd5ac3582e45be77*************************

The original files should remain unchanged. Any public version should be created as a separate redacted copy.

XIII. Requested Follow-Up Actions

I request that the following records be preserved and reviewed:

1. Full Ring Patio Camera video history for June 11, 2026, including any unavailable, skipped, deleted, or missing intervals.
2. Ring account login history.
3. Ring shared-user list and permission history.
4. Ring video deletion history, if available.
5. Ring device-health and connectivity records.
6. Apple ID / iCloud account access history.
7. Apple trusted-device list and any unrecognized trusted devices.
8. Apple account-recovery records.
9. iPhone 17 device logs, passcode-change history if available, device-pairing records, and relevant security settings.
10. Apple Smartwatch 7 security settings and device-pairing records.
11. Mac Mini M1 login and iCloud-related security records.
12. iPad M3 Air security and account-access records.
13. Verizon account login history.
14. Verizon password-change logs.
15. Verizon PIN-change logs.
16. Verizon voicemail-change logs.
17. Verizon eSIM provisioning records.
18. Verizon customer-service interaction records.
19. Verizon fraud/security review records.
20. Verizon CPNI access records, if available through proper process.
21. SwitchBot complete lock-history export for June 9 through June 11, 2026.
22. SwitchBot account login history and shared-user settings.
23. Property-management exterior camera footage for the parking area during the relevant period.
24. Any building or parking-lot camera footage showing the black pickup-style vehicle, royal blue vehicle, or second adult person with the basket/container.
25. Any property-management records concerning tenant complaints, access logs, or common-area activity during the relevant period.
26. Any law-enforcement or service-provider review necessary to determine whether unauthorized account access, video deletion, device mirroring, device cloning, or other digital tampering occurred.

XIV. Public Redaction Notes

For public posting, I recommend redacting or masking:

1. Full tenant names except my own name.
2. Apartment numbers, including Unit 2**, Unit 3**, and Unit 1**.
3. Building numbers, if public identification of the apartment complex could result.
4. License plates.
5. Faces of tenants or other identifiable persons.
6. Exact building address.
7. Email addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, device serial numbers, IMEI numbers, eSIM identifiers, and Apple/Verizon account identifiers.
8. Any visible Ring, SwitchBot, Apple, or Verizon account details.
9. Any sensitive location details that could identify the property.
10. Any passwords, PINs, passcodes, recovery keys, account-reset links, QR codes, or one-time passcodes.

For law enforcement, property management, Verizon, Apple, Ring, SwitchBot, service providers, or cybersecurity review, the original unredacted evidence files should be preserved unchanged.

XV. Statement of Good-Faith Belief

I am making this report based on my personal observations, Ring Patio Camera footage, the apparent missing Ring video interval, the SwitchBot Kitchen Door Entrance lock-log screenshot, and my personal timeline of Verizon, Apple, iCloud, and device-security changes made on June 11, 2026.

I believe this incident raises legitimate concerns involving possible tenant harassment, possible unauthorized Verizon account access, possible unauthorized Apple device or iCloud ecosystem access, possible Ring video deletion or unavailable footage, possible digital tampering, possible unauthorized knowledge of private account-security changes, and apartment-security concerns.

The Ring videos and screenshot do not independently prove all suspected misconduct. They do, however, document relevant visible activity, timestamps, device-log information, and evidence that should be preserved and reviewed. For that reason, I am preserving this incident report and related exhibits as part of my official documentation.

Prepared by: Sarai Hannah Ajai
Date Prepared: June 11, 2026
Related Evidence: Exhibits A1, A2, and B1

Passwords / Sensitive Credentials: Preserved separately and not included in this report