Labels

SARAI HANNAH AJAI'S INCIDENT REPORT REPEATED UNEXPLAINED DUPLICATION OF CORRESPONDENCE EMAIL INFORMATION DURING USPTO PATENT CENTER FILING, TEMPORARY CORRECTION, REPORTED ACCOUNT LOGOUT, SUSPECTED UNAUTHORIZED DEVICE OR SESSION INTERFERENCE, AND RELATED TENANT THREATS CONCERNING APPLE-DEVICE ACCESS

 INCIDENT REPORT

REPEATED UNEXPLAINED DUPLICATION OF CORRESPONDENCE EMAIL INFORMATION DURING USPTO PATENT CENTER FILING, TEMPORARY CORRECTION, REPORTED ACCOUNT LOGOUT, SUSPECTED UNAUTHORIZED DEVICE OR SESSION INTERFERENCE, AND RELATED TENANT THREATS CONCERNING APPLE-DEVICE ACCESS

REDACTED

Reporting Party: Sarai Hannah Ajai




Affected Device: Apple Mac Mini M1
Affected Online System: United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Center
Affected Filing: Utility nonprovisional patent application under 35 U.S.C. § 111(a)
Title of Invention: Lockbox Protocol: A Software-Based Virtual Security Key for Session Authentication and Credential Integrity

Incident Date: July 6, 2026
Documented Time Range: Approximately 4:07:54 PM through 5:35:03 PM Central Time
Date Prepared: July 7, 2026
Incident Type: Unexplained duplication of correspondence-email data; Patent Center form-integrity concern; repeated cancellation and resubmission activity; reported involuntary account logout; suspected unauthorized device or browser-session interference; possible browser autofill, synchronized form data, software malfunction, or Patent Center form-state error; reported tenant threats and demands concerning access to Apple devices.

1. Purpose of This Incident Report

This Incident Report documents a prolonged and repeatedly disruptive event that occurred on July 6, 2026, while I was preparing a time-sensitive nonprovisional utility patent application through the USPTO Patent Center.

During the Application Details portion of the Patent Center filing process, I entered my assigned correspondence email address one time only, in the first email-address textbox.

I did not enter, paste, select, authorize, or otherwise place an email address into the second or third email-address textboxes.

After completing the Application Details section and proceeding to the Patent Center Summary page to review the information before signing, I discovered that additional email addresses had appeared in the correspondence section. The Summary displayed email addresses in positions corresponding to Textboxes 2 and 3, even though I had left those fields blank.

The unexplained entries repeatedly remained, increased, or returned after I attempted to correct the application through cancellation, return-to-form, restart, and resubmission procedures.

The incident continued through multiple correction cycles over approximately one hour and twenty-six minutes. A temporarily corrected Summary was documented at approximately 4:38 PM. I report that immediately after this temporary correction, I was logged out of my USPTO account. After I returned to the application, the duplicated email information reappeared and required another extended correction process.

This report also documents my prior and continuing concern that tenants in my residential complex have made statements that I understood as threats, hostility, or pressure concerning access to or sharing of my Apple devices. I do not consent to sharing my devices, passwords, accounts, files, remote access, or electronic capabilities with any tenant or other person.

I suspect that unauthorized interference may have occurred, but this report does not claim that the screenshots alone conclusively prove hacking or identify any responsible person. Browser autofill, synchronization, cached form data, browser extensions, Patent Center programming behavior, account-session issues, or another technical malfunction must also be objectively investigated.

2. Summary of the Patent Center Incident

On July 6, 2026, I logged into the USPTO Patent Center and began preparing a new utility nonprovisional patent application for the Lockbox Protocol invention.

Within the Patent Center Application Details section, I entered my correspondence email address once in the first email-address field.

My intended entries were:

Email Textbox 1: My assigned correspondence email address
Email Textbox 2: Left blank
Email Textbox 3: Left blank

I then proceeded through the remaining application sections and reached the Summary page to verify all information before signing.

At the Summary stage, I observed that additional email addresses had appeared beneath my correspondence information. These entries did not match the single-entry configuration I had supplied.

The email-address duplication persisted through repeated correction attempts. The evidence shows:

  • The first clear duplication was documented at approximately 4:08:38 PM.
  • A temporary corrected display was documented at approximately 4:38:14 PM.
  • I report that Patent Center then logged me out.
  • The duplication was documented again at approximately 4:58:18 PM.
  • The repeated entries remained visible through approximately 5:19:44 PM.
  • A final corrected Summary showing only one correspondence email address was documented at approximately 5:35:03 PM.

The total documented period from the first clear duplication to the final corrected display was approximately:

1 hour, 26 minutes, and 25 seconds.

3. Precise Statement of What I Entered

I formally state the following:

  1. I entered my assigned correspondence email address one time.
  2. I entered it into the first email-address textbox in the Application Details section.
  3. I did not enter an email address into Textbox 2.
  4. I did not enter an email address into Textbox 3.
  5. I did not copy and paste the address into the additional fields.
  6. I did not intentionally activate a browser function to populate all available email fields.
  7. I did not authorize another person to enter additional email addresses.
  8. I discovered the additional entries only after reaching the Summary page.
  9. The Summary information did not accurately reflect the single email entry I had knowingly supplied.
  10. I repeatedly attempted to correct the Summary before signing the Application Data Sheet.

Any prior wording suggesting that I personally entered information in Textboxes 2 or 3 is incorrect and is superseded by this report.

4. Intended and Observed Configuration

A. Intended configuration

Email Textbox 1:

One assigned correspondence email address entered by me

 

Email Textbox 2:

Blank

 

Email Textbox 3:

Blank

B. Configuration shown in the Summary

The Summary displayed additional correspondence email entries after I had completed the Application Details section.

At various times, the Summary showed:

  • The email entered in Textbox 1;
  • Additional copies of that email;
  • Other email addresses associated with my projects or accounts;
  • Numerous repeated email lines extending substantially down the Summary page.

The quantity of visible repetitions increased during some later attempts.

5. Chronology of Documented Events

A. Exhibit A1 — Summary page reached

Timestamp: July 6, 2026, approximately 4:07:54 PM Central Time

Exhibit A1 shows that I had reached the USPTO Patent Center Summary page.

The screenshot establishes that I was reviewing the completed application information before signing.

The correspondence information was positioned lower on the page and was not yet fully visible in the screenshot.

B. Exhibit A2 — First clear documentation of duplication

Timestamp: Approximately 4:08:38 PM

Exhibit A2 clearly shows multiple email addresses listed in the correspondence section.

The screenshot includes my assigned correspondence email and additional repeated addresses beneath it.

This is the first preserved screenshot clearly documenting the problem.

C. Exhibits B1 and B2 — First temporary correction

Timestamps: Approximately 4:37:33 PM and 4:38:14 PM

Exhibits B1 and B2 show the Summary page after the first correction cycle.

The correspondence section displays only one email address, which matches the single-address configuration I intended.

The documented time from the first clear duplication at 4:08:38 PM to the temporary corrected display at 4:38:14 PM was:

29 minutes and 36 seconds.

I report that immediately after I reached this corrected state, Patent Center logged me out of my account.

The B1 and B2 screenshots document the corrected Summary immediately before the reported logout. The screenshots themselves do not identify the technical cause of the logout or prove who initiated it.

D. Exhibit C1 — Duplication reappears

Timestamp: Approximately 4:58:18 PM

After returning to the application, Exhibit C1 shows that multiple duplicate email lines were again visible in the correspondence section.

The time between the first temporary correction at 4:38:14 PM and the documented recurrence at 4:58:18 PM was:

20 minutes and 4 seconds.

E. Exhibits C2 and D1 — Continued duplicate entries

Timestamp: Approximately 5:06:53 PM

Exhibits C2 and D1 show that duplicate correspondence email entries remained visible.

The correspondence section displays the same address multiple times, confirming that the issue had not been permanently corrected.

F. Exhibits C3a and E1 — Continued Summary review

Timestamp: Approximately 5:18:20 PM

These exhibits show that I remained on or returned to the Patent Center Summary page during the correction process.

G. Exhibits C3b and E2 — Extensive repeated entries

Timestamp: Approximately 5:19:44 PM

These screenshots provide some of the clearest evidence of the severity of the duplication.

The same email address appears repeatedly in a long vertical list extending down the Summary page.

The quantity of visible email repetitions substantially exceeds the three email fields presented during Application Details.

H. Exhibit G2 — Video of Application Details entry

Approximate recording time: Around 5:26 PM

Exhibit G2 is a video showing me working on the Apple Mac Mini M1 while the Patent Center Application Details page is displayed.

The video supports my statement that I entered the email information during the Application Details process.

The video is relevant to my assertion that I supplied the email address only once in the first available field.

Because the video was recorded from a distance, the screenshots and Patent Center records may provide clearer verification of the exact field contents.

I. Exhibit G1 — Video of Summary duplication

Approximate recording time: Around 5:27 PM

Exhibit G1 shows the Patent Center Summary page while the expanded correspondence-information problem was present.

The video supports the contemporaneous existence of the Summary-display issue.

The clearest readable evidence of the repeated entries remains the screenshots identified as Exhibits C3b and E2.

J. Exhibits F1 and F2 — Final correction

Timestamps: Approximately 5:34:19 PM and 5:35:03 PM

Exhibits F1 and F2 show the final corrected Summary.

The correspondence information displays only the single email address that I intended to provide.

The second correction period, measured from the documented recurrence at 4:58:18 PM to the final corrected display at 5:35:03 PM, lasted:

36 minutes and 45 seconds.

K. Total documented duration

From the first clear duplication screenshot at 4:08:38 PM to the final corrected display at 5:35:03 PM:

1 hour, 26 minutes, and 25 seconds.

From the time I first reached the Summary page at 4:07:54 PM to the final corrected display:

1 hour, 27 minutes, and 9 seconds.

6. Repeated Cancellation, Correction, and Resubmission Efforts

During the documented incident period, I repeatedly attempted to remove or prevent the duplicated information.

My actions included:

  • Returning from the Summary page to Application Details;
  • Reviewing the email fields;
  • Confirming that only the first field contained the intended address;
  • Leaving Textboxes 2 and 3 blank;
  • Saving the section;
  • Returning to the Summary;
  • Canceling the filing workflow when the Summary appeared corrupted;
  • Restarting the Web ADS process;
  • Reentering or reconfirming required filing information;
  • Repeating the review process;
  • Refusing to sign a Summary containing unexplained duplicate entries.

The repeated process was time-consuming and mentally exhausting.

The duplication did not appear as a single harmless display anomaly. It repeatedly returned after correction attempts and affected information presented for signature in an official federal patent filing.

7. Reported Logout Following Temporary Correction

At approximately 4:38 PM, the Summary first appeared corrected.

I report that immediately after reaching this corrected state, I was involuntarily logged out of my USPTO account.

I did not intentionally select a logout command.

I experienced the timing of the logout as suspicious because it occurred immediately after I had successfully removed the duplicated entries.

However, I cannot determine from the screenshots alone whether the logout resulted from:

  • Session expiration;
  • Patent Center security controls;
  • Browser or network interruption;
  • An account-session conflict;
  • A software malfunction;
  • Another device or session;
  • Unauthorized interference.

USPTO authentication and session logs would be necessary to determine the cause.

8. Absence of Another Visible Browser Window or Tab

During the incident, I did not observe:

  • A second Patent Center browser tab;
  • A second visible browser window;
  • A visible remote-desktop application;
  • A visible screen-sharing notification;
  • Another person physically using the computer;
  • A prompt authorizing remote control;
  • A notice that another user had joined the session.

The lack of another visible tab or window did not rule out browser synchronization, hidden background activity, remote access, or server-side form behavior.

It did increase my concern because the Summary data differed from the information I knowingly entered.

9. Tenant-Related Threat and Hostility Context

Separate from the visible Patent Center evidence, I report that tenants in my residential complex have repeatedly expressed hostility toward me.

I have heard or learned of statements that certain tenants “do not like me.”

I also report that one or more tenants have made statements or engaged in conduct that I understood as threats, demands, or pressure that I share my Apple devices or electronic access with other persons in the residential complex, including persons I regard as criminals.

I do not consent to sharing:

  • My Apple Mac Mini M1;
  • My iPhone;
  • My iPad;
  • My passwords;
  • My Apple Account;
  • My email accounts;
  • My USPTO account;
  • My browser sessions;
  • My files;
  • My intellectual-property materials;
  • My screen;
  • My keyboard or mouse controls;
  • Remote login;
  • Screen sharing;
  • Device mirroring;
  • Account access;
  • Network access;
  • Any other electronic capability.

I am not legally or voluntarily sharing my devices with tenants.

I do not accept the position that another person’s dislike of me creates any justification to access, monitor, control, copy, mirror, or interfere with my devices.

I have experienced these circumstances over a period of years and now feel severe emotional discomfort, anger, exhaustion, and distress when I encounter certain tenants.

For safety, I intend to avoid direct confrontation and communicate through property management, law enforcement, or other appropriate channels.

10. Relationship Between Tenant Concerns and the Patent Center Incident

Based on the reported statements, prior experiences, and unexplained behavior on my devices, I suspect that one or more tenants may be connected to unauthorized device interference.

However, this report does not claim that the Patent Center screenshots or videos identify a tenant or prove that a tenant caused the email duplication or account logout.

The evidence directly establishes:

  • The Summary displayed multiple email addresses;
  • I had intended to submit one email address;
  • The problem persisted through multiple attempts;
  • The Summary temporarily appeared corrected;
  • I report that a logout occurred;
  • The duplicate entries later reappeared;
  • The final corrected state was reached after approximately one hour and twenty-six minutes.

The evidence does not independently establish:

  • The identity of the person who caused the behavior;
  • Whether any tenant had technical access;
  • Whether remote access occurred;
  • Whether the cause was Patent Center, Chrome, macOS, autofill, synchronization, or another technical process.

The tenant-related concerns should therefore be documented as context and investigated separately rather than treated as a proven technical conclusion.

11. Suspected Unauthorized Interference

Because of the repeated and unexplained nature of the event, the reported logout, prior security concerns, and reported tenant statements, I became concerned that an unauthorized person or persons might have been:

  • Viewing my screen;
  • Mirroring my Apple Mac Mini M1;
  • Cloning or reproducing my browser session;
  • Controlling keyboard or mouse input;
  • Accessing my authenticated USPTO session;
  • Synchronizing data through another device;
  • Altering application information after I completed a section;
  • Attempting to obstruct or delay the filing;
  • Monitoring confidential patent information.

This is my good-faith suspicion.

It is not presented as a final forensic conclusion.

12. Neutral Technical Explanations Requiring Investigation

The following technical explanations must also be considered:

A. Browser autofill

Chrome may have interpreted multiple fields as email fields and populated them automatically.

B. Browser-profile synchronization

Stored contact information may have synchronized from another device or browser profile.

C. Patent Center field-mapping error

The first email field may have been copied into multiple Summary records.

D. Cached form data

Earlier entries may have remained in the session and been appended during each resubmission.

E. Duplicate form submission

The system may have added rather than replaced correspondence-email values.

F. Browser extension behavior

A password manager, form-filling extension, or other extension may have modified the fields.

G. Session corruption

The Patent Center Web ADS session may have retained inconsistent server-side state.

H. Multiple authenticated sessions

Another authorized or unauthorized session may have accessed the same draft.

I. Network interruption

Intermittent connectivity may have caused duplicate requests or inconsistent saves.

J. Unauthorized remote access

A third party may have interacted with the device or account.

A reliable technical investigation should compare these possibilities against USPTO session logs, browser records, and macOS security information.

13. Why the Incident Was Serious

The incident involved information intended for submission to a federal agency.

Correspondence information may be used by the USPTO to send:

  • Filing receipts;
  • Missing-parts notices;
  • Examination correspondence;
  • Fee notices;
  • Office actions;
  • Application-status notices;
  • Time-sensitive deadlines;
  • Other legally significant communications.

Unexplained alteration or duplication could:

  • Create an inaccurate official record;
  • Misroute official correspondence;
  • Add unauthorized recipients;
  • Affect notice delivery;
  • Cause missed deadlines;
  • Require a corrected Application Data Sheet;
  • Delay examination;
  • Expose confidential information;
  • Interfere with the patent filing date;
  • Undermine confidence in the application record.

The application was time-sensitive because it claimed the benefit of a provisional patent application filed July 7, 2025.

The prolonged correction process increased my concern that I might be prevented from completing the nonprovisional filing on time.

14. Emotional, Administrative, and Legal Impact

The incident caused:

  • Approximately one hour and twenty-six minutes of documented disruption;
  • Multiple canceled and restarted filing attempts;
  • Repetition of previously completed work;
  • Fear of missing a patent deadline;
  • Concern regarding invention confidentiality;
  • Concern that official USPTO records could become inaccurate;
  • Fear that my devices or accounts were being accessed;
  • Severe frustration;
  • Mental fatigue;
  • Anxiety;
  • Anger;
  • Loss of confidence in the filing system;
  • Additional time spent preserving evidence;
  • Additional work preparing this Incident Report.

The tenant-related statements and hostility further intensified my distress.

I state that I can no longer comfortably look at or interact with certain tenants because of what I believe I have experienced over a period of years.

15. Evidence Inventory

Exhibit A1

Summary page reached — approximately 4:07:54 PM

Shows the Patent Center Summary page before the correspondence section was fully visible.

Exhibit A2

First visible duplicate email entries — approximately 4:08:38 PM

Shows several email addresses listed beneath the correspondence information.

Exhibit B1

Temporarily corrected Summary — approximately 4:37:33 PM

Shows the Summary page following the first correction cycle.

Exhibit B2

Temporarily corrected correspondence information — approximately 4:38:14 PM

Shows one email address in the correspondence section.

Exhibit C1

Duplications reappear — approximately 4:58:18 PM

Shows repeated email addresses following the reported logout and return to the application.

Exhibit C2

Duplicate entries continue — approximately 5:06:53 PM

Shows repeated correspondence email entries.

Exhibit C3a

Continued Summary review — approximately 5:18:20 PM

Shows the Patent Center Summary page during the second correction cycle.

Exhibit C3b

Extensive email duplication — approximately 5:19:44 PM

Shows a long vertical list of repeated email entries.

Exhibit D1

Duplicate entries at approximately 5:06:53 PM

Provides an additional view of the continued duplication.

Exhibit E1

Summary-page continuation — approximately 5:18:20 PM

Documents the ongoing correction process.

Exhibit E2

Extensive repeated entries — approximately 5:19:44 PM

Provides another clear view of numerous repeated email lines.

Exhibit F1

Final corrected Summary — approximately 5:34:19 PM

Shows the final stage of the corrected Summary.

Exhibit F2

Final corrected correspondence information — approximately 5:35:03 PM

Shows one correspondence email address with no visible duplication.

Exhibit G1

Video showing duplicated email information on the Summary page

Shows the Patent Center Summary while the correspondence-information problem was present.

Exhibit G2

Video showing Application Details email entry

Shows me working in Patent Center Application Details and supports my statement that I entered one email address in the first field.

16. Actions Taken

I took the following actions:

  1. Entered my correspondence email once in Textbox 1.
  2. Left Textboxes 2 and 3 blank.
  3. Completed the remaining Patent Center sections.
  4. Reviewed the Summary.
  5. Identified the unexplained additional entries.
  6. Returned to Application Details.
  7. Rechecked the correspondence fields.
  8. Repeated cancellation and resubmission steps.
  9. Refused to knowingly sign a corrupted Summary.
  10. Captured screenshots.
  11. Recorded videos.
  12. Documented the temporary corrected state.
  13. Returned to the application after the reported logout.
  14. Documented the recurrence.
  15. Continued correcting the application.
  16. Reached a final corrected Summary at approximately 5:35 PM.
  17. Completed the patent filing.
  18. Preserved the Application Data Sheet, specification, drawings, receipts, screenshots, and videos.
  19. Prepared this written report.

17. Statement of Nonauthorization

I formally state that I did not authorize any tenant, resident, visitor, employee, contractor, acquaintance, or other person to:

  • Access my Apple Mac Mini M1;
  • Use my Apple devices;
  • Share my devices;
  • Access my Apple Account;
  • Access my USPTO account;
  • Access the Lockbox Protocol application;
  • Enter or duplicate email addresses;
  • Change correspondence information;
  • Control my keyboard or mouse;
  • Mirror my screen;
  • Clone my computer session;
  • View confidential patent materials;
  • Copy my files;
  • Access my email;
  • Use remote login;
  • Use screen sharing;
  • Use remote management;
  • Interfere with the filing;
  • Delay the filing;
  • Log me out of Patent Center;
  • Sign or submit documents on my behalf.

I do not consent to the use, control, sharing, copying, mirroring, monitoring, or remote access of my devices by any tenant or other person.

18. Requested USPTO Investigation

I request that the USPTO preserve and review:

  1. Login timestamps;
  2. Logout timestamps;
  3. Session-expiration records;
  4. Authentication events;
  5. Source IP addresses;
  6. Browser and device identifiers;
  7. Concurrent-session records;
  8. Draft-access records;
  9. Application Details save events;
  10. Correspondence-email field values;
  11. Summary-generation events;
  12. Duplicate data records;
  13. Repeated POST or save requests;
  14. Cancellation and restart events;
  15. Web ADS session identifiers;
  16. Application Data Sheet generation logs;
  17. Any known Patent Center issue involving repeated email fields;
  18. Any record showing that one email address was appended multiple times;
  19. Any access from an unfamiliar device or location;
  20. Any security event associated with the reported logout.

I request written confirmation of whether Patent Center’s systems received repeated email-field submissions from my browser or internally created duplicate entries.

19. Requested Apple and Browser Review

I request review and preservation of available records concerning:

  • Apple Account devices;
  • macOS login records;
  • Remote Login;
  • Screen Sharing;
  • Remote Management;
  • Sharing settings;
  • Accessibility permissions;
  • Input Monitoring permissions;
  • Screen Recording permissions;
  • Full Disk Access;
  • Login items;
  • Configuration profiles;
  • Browser extensions;
  • Chrome synchronization;
  • Autofill settings;
  • Password-manager activity;
  • Browser history;
  • Browser-session data;
  • Network connections;
  • Unknown user accounts;
  • Remote-control applications;
  • Clipboard synchronization;
  • Keyboard and mouse input controls;
  • Security alerts.

The purpose is to determine whether the event originated from:

  • Patent Center;
  • Chrome;
  • macOS;
  • Apple synchronization;
  • Another authorized device;
  • A software defect;
  • An unauthorized person.

20. Requested Property-Management and Safety Review

Because of the reported tenant threats and hostility, I request that property management:

  1. Document my complaint in writing.
  2. Investigate direct threats or demands concerning my devices.
  3. Direct tenants not to approach me regarding my electronic devices or accounts.
  4. Preserve relevant surveillance video.
  5. Preserve written complaints and communications.
  6. Address harassment or intimidation under applicable lease and housing policies.
  7. Provide a safe written channel for reporting future incidents.
  8. Avoid disclosing my private account or device information to other tenants.

This request does not ask property management to determine the technical cause of the Patent Center duplication. It asks management to address reported tenant conduct and safety concerns.

21. Evidentiary Limitations

The evidence directly supports that:

  • I reached the Patent Center Summary page;
  • Multiple email addresses appeared in the correspondence section;
  • The repeated entries persisted;
  • A temporary corrected state was reached;
  • The duplicates later reappeared;
  • A final corrected state was eventually reached;
  • The total documented duration was approximately one hour and twenty-six minutes;
  • Videos were recorded during the Application Details and Summary processes.

The evidence does not independently establish:

  • Who caused the duplication;
  • Whether a tenant was involved;
  • Whether hacking occurred;
  • Whether the logout was intentional;
  • Whether remote access was active;
  • Whether the cause was a Patent Center defect, browser autofill, synchronization, or another process.

I request an objective technical investigation rather than relying solely on inference.

22. Preservation of Evidence

I preserved or request preservation of:

  • Original screenshots;
  • Original video files;
  • File metadata;
  • Browser history;
  • USPTO receipts;
  • Final ADS;
  • Patent specification;
  • Drawing files;
  • Payment records;
  • Follow-on submissions;
  • Patent Center logs;
  • Login and logout records;
  • Device logs;
  • Network records;
  • Router records;
  • Security alerts;
  • Tenant communications;
  • Property-management complaints;
  • Surveillance footage;
  • Written notes;
  • Any record concerning demands that I share my devices.

Original files should not be edited, recompressed, renamed without retaining originals, or posted publicly with unredacted personal information.

23. Final Filing Outcome

Despite the repeated disruption, I ultimately completed the Lockbox Protocol nonprovisional utility patent filing.

The filing included:

  • Application Data Sheet;
  • Formal specification;
  • Five formal drawing sheets;
  • Filing, search, examination, and non-DOCX fees;
  • Micro entity certification as a follow-on document;
  • Filing and payment receipts.

The successful filing does not erase the earlier disruption or establish that the unexplained duplication was harmless.

24. Requested Outcome

I request:

  1. A complete technical investigation.
  2. Preservation of USPTO session logs.
  3. Identification of the cause of the duplicate entries.
  4. Identification of the cause of the reported logout.
  5. Confirmation that the final correspondence record contains only the authorized email address.
  6. Confirmation that no unauthorized party was added to the application.
  7. Confirmation of whether another session or device accessed the filing.
  8. Review of my Apple devices and browser settings.
  9. Preservation of tenant-related threat evidence.
  10. Written response from property management regarding reported threats.
  11. Correction of any remaining inaccurate USPTO information.
  12. Preservation of evidence for any FTC, FBI IC3, USPTO, Apple, law-enforcement, civil-rights, or housing complaint.
  13. Confirmation that no tenant or other person has authorization to use or share my devices.
  14. Written documentation of any verified software malfunction or security incident.

25. Closing Statement

On July 6, 2026, I entered my assigned correspondence email address one time in the first email-address textbox of the USPTO Patent Center Application Details section.

I did not enter email addresses into Textboxes 2 or 3.

When I reached the Summary page, additional email addresses appeared beneath the correspondence information.

I repeatedly canceled, corrected, restarted, and resubmitted portions of the filing.

The first clear duplicated entries were documented at approximately 4:08:38 PM.

A temporary corrected state was documented at approximately 4:38:14 PM. I report that I was then immediately logged out of my USPTO account.

After I returned, the duplicated entries reappeared and remained visible through multiple later screenshots and a video.

The final corrected Summary was documented at approximately 5:35:03 PM.

The total documented period from the first clear duplication to the final correction was approximately one hour, twenty-six minutes, and twenty-five seconds.

I also report that tenants in my residential complex have expressed hostility toward me and have made statements or engaged in conduct that I understood as threats or demands concerning the sharing of my Apple devices with other persons.

I do not consent to sharing my devices, passwords, accounts, files, screen, remote access, or electronic capabilities with any tenant or other person.

I suspect unauthorized interference, but I recognize that the available evidence does not conclusively identify the cause or responsible party.

I request preservation of all records and an objective technical, account-security, housing-safety, and device-security investigation.

Prepared by:
Sarai Hannah Ajai

Date Prepared:
July 7, 2026

Signature:

Sarai Hannah Ajai















































Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment